Skip to content

Note-email recipient first-name + GL-code / original-description live plumbing

Why (split from T-049 amendments, 2026-06-16)

The note-notification + WOPC payment email redesign (T-049 amendments, nightly 8f732382 → main) shipped with two fields wired as BEST-EFFORT placeholders rather than live data:

  • Recipient first name — the greeting falls back to a generic/full name instead of the recipient's actual first name.
  • GL code + original transaction description — surfaced from whatever was conveniently available at send time, not plumbed from the authoritative transaction record.

Scope

Plumb both from the source of truth at send time: - recipient first name from the resolved Individual / payee record (not a string split). - GL code + original description from the transaction (use buildInvoiceRecord / transaction accessors per docs/api-catalog.md) so the email mirrors the ledger exactly.

Log

  • 2026-06-16 created. Reserved earlier in the T-049 amendments entry; formalized as its own UID.